Modular vs traditional
Neutral comparison of volumetric modular vs traditional construction for UK schools, in £/m², programme certainty and 30-year life-cycle.
Where modular wins
- Live-site expansions where summer-only delivery matters.
- Standardised programmes (multiple primaries of the same design).
- Constrained sites where in-situ trades would be very disrupted.
- Schemes where Spec21 fabric performance is best controlled in a factory[Spec21].
Where traditional wins
- Bespoke designs (unusual SEN provision, complex sixth-form mixes) where module-grid constraints add cost.
- Difficult site access (rural, urban-infill) where module delivery is hard.
- Tight planning context where rooflines and material palettes are constrained.
- Heritage / sensitive site contexts.
CF25 lots covering each
CF25[CF25] has specific MMC / off-site lots; many of the Tier-1 contractors offer modular through subsidiaries or supply-chain partners. Traditional is covered across the general construction lots in both value bands.
See modular new-build archetype.